Dental News is a professional magazine with articles from high ranked universities and influential dentists all over the world. Our Articles are from universities like New York University, Tufts University, Baylor University, Temple University just to cite a few.
Orthodontic management of an impacted mandibular canine in a 14 years old Kuwaiti girl
By Dr. Saud A. Al-Anezi BDS (Liverpool, UK), Doctorate in Orthodontics (Bristol, UK)
An impacted tooth can be defined as a tooth with a delayed in eruption time or that are not expected to erupt completely based on clinical and radiographic assessment. 1 An impacted tooth in children is a major problem with potentially damaging sequelae such as, damage to the adjacent teeth and cystic formation. The prevalence of impacted maxillary canine is reported to be 1.5% 2, however, the prevalence of impaction of the mandibular canine is much lower. 3,4 In one particular study, the incidence of mandibular canine impaction was shown to be 1.29% in 5022 individuals of a Turkish population sample. 5 Clinicians should suspect impaction if the canine is not palpable in the buccal sulcus by the age of 10–11 years, hence a full clinical examination and radiographic assessment are essential in order to locate the canines. 6
There are many etiological factors that can lead to the failure of eruption such as the presence of a supernumerary tooth that prevents the successful eruption of the canine. Early diagnosis of such problem will make the treatment simpler and in some cases shortens the treatment duration. The aim of this report is to illustrate a conventional orthodontic treatment of an impacted mandibular canine which was diagnosed late.
Figure 1. Pre-treatment Extra-oral photographs.
Figure 2. Pre-treatment Intra-oral photographs.
Clinical Presentation and Intervention
A 14 years old Kuwaiti girl attended the clinic complaining of “a gap between bottom teeth” (Fig 1). She was fit and well. She had a Class 1 skeletal pattern with average vertical proportions. In the intra-oral examination, it was found that, her oral hygiene was fair and required improvement prior to the initiation of orthodontic treatment (Fig 2). Furthermore, there was mild crowding in the mandibular arch and well aligned maxillary arch. The overjet was increased with an average overbite and a mild central line discrepancy. The buccal segments were Class 1.
All permanent dentition were present except for the lower right manbibular canine and the third molars. Further investigations revealed that the tooth was lingually displaced with no presence of any supernumerary or any other obstruction preventing its eruption (Figure 3). The treatment plan was to initiate a fixed orthodontic appliance therapy to create more space for the mandibular canine then carry on a surgical exposure procedure to uncover the tooth and enable its trac-tion through the orthodontic appliance using an 0.22 inch slot, MBT prescription. Treatment started with leveling and alignment through 0.14 and 0.18 inch Nickel Titanium wires. Furthermore, the treatment continued through 0.19x0.25 NiTi and Stainless Steel archwires to achieve the treatment objectives (Figure 4). A retention regime was also planned which included a fixed retainer in the lower arch to minimize the risk of relapse of the impacted canine after alignment plus an upper and lower removable retainers.
Figure 3. Pre-treatment radiographs.
Figure 4. During the surgical exposure procedure and photographs of following visits.
Although the impaction of a mandibular canines is not frequently occurring episode compared to maxillary canines, those individuals with this problem may suffer potentially harmful effects if left untreated. The impacted maxillary canine is extensively discussed and mentioned in the dental literature unlike the mandibular canine. The key factor here is 7 the early diagnosis, because that will allow some simpler measures such as the removal of the deciduous tooth at the appropriate time. This would enable the permanent canine to follow its course and erupt normally. However, as children grow older (i.e. beyond the age of 12-13 years), the use of this simple “interceptive” measure is no longer feasible and more comprehensive treatment should be considered. 1 The treatment options then are categorically divided into two: 1) either to attempt to orthodontically align the tooth with or without surgical intervention, or 2) extraction of the tooth and replace it with a dental implant. The definitive treatment plan can be decided on several factors such as the age of the treatment 5, the age of the patient, the more likely orthodontic treatment will work and vice versa. Another factor is the position of the impacted tooth.4 If the tooth, as in this case report, was not far away from its original place, it is considered favorable to surgically expose it and align it orthodontically.8 This is decided after a careful clinical and radiographic examination. Another extremely useful tool that can be used is the use of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan 9 , however, this was not available to the author at the start of treatment. It can be stated that, if the tooth was positioned deep in the bone and the surgical removal of it bears many risks, as an alternative, the tooth can be left in situ providing regular monitoring of the tooth, in order to detect any changes that may occur.
Another treatment option is to auto-transplant the tooth (i.e. to extract it surgically and reimplant it in its place), nonetheless, that approach has very poor prognosis and very rarely considered as an option. 10,11 It must emphasized that for each treatment option, there are advantages and disadvantages. For instance, if orthodontic treatment with surgical exposure plan was chosen, treatment duration may be long as opposed to the extraction and the implant option which takes shorter treatment duration to accomplish. However, the main advantage with the orthodontic treatment approach is that a prosthesis is not required and an ideal occlusion can be achieved (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Post-treatment Intra-oral photographs.
Impacted maxillary canines are more common than mandibular canines. The treatment plan for such teeth will be based on several factors such as the age of the patient and the position of the tooth. Treatment options includes orthodontic treatment to align the tooth or removal of the tooth and replace it with a dental implant. This girl was treated successfully via surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment because the position of the impacted canine was favorable.
1. Richardson G, Russell KA. A Review of Impacted Permanent Maxillary Cuspids: Diagnosis and Prevention. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:497-501.
2. Ericson S and Kurol J. Radiographic examination of ectopically erupting maxillary canines. Am J Orthod 1987; 91: 483-492.
3. Aydin U, Yilmaz HH, Yildirim D. Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a patient population. Dentomax Radiol 2004; 33:164-9.
4. Alaejos-Algarra C, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Transmigration of man-dibular canines: Report of six cases and review of the literature. Quint Int. 1998; 29:395-398.
5. Yavus MS, Aras MH, Buyukkurt MC, Tozoglu S. Impacted Mandibular Canines. J of Contemporary Dent Practice. 2007; 8(7):2-9.
6. The management of the palatally ectopic maxillary canine. National Clinical Guidelines. The Royal College of Surgeons of England, www.rcseng.ac.uk, March 2010.
7. Ericson S and Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbances. Eur J Orthod 1986; 8: 133-140.
8. McSherry PF. The ectopic maxillary canine: a review. Br J Orthod 1998; 25: 209-216.
9. YH Jung, H Liang, BW Benson, DJ Flint, BH Cho.The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012: 41(5): 356-360.
10. Thomas S, Turner SR, Sandy JR. Autotransplantation of teeth: Is there a role? Br J Orthod 1998;25: 275–82.
11. Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Bjercke B,Zachrisson BU. Outcome of tooth transplantation: survival and success rates 17-41 years posttreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121: 110–19.
By Dr. Sawsan Nasreddine,Dr. Fida Sayah, Dr. Fady Kassir, and Pr. Mounir Doumit, of the Lebanese University, School of Dentistry
Discoloration of the tooth can erode the sparkle from a smile. There are many factors that contribute to tooth staining. It is important to understand that in some cases staining can be prevented but in others it cannot. There are two types of tooth discoloration: extrinsic which affects teeth from the outside and intrinsic which affects the teeth from the inside. The purpose of this article is to review literature on the etiologies and classification of tooth staining and discoloration. Key words: Etiology, classification, extrinsic discoloration, intrinsic discoloration
Introduction The appearance of the dentition is of concern to a large number of people seeking dental treatment and the color of the teeth is of particular cosmetic importance. Tooth discoloration is usually esthetically displeasing and p…
problem of inferior alveolar nerve involvement during surgical procedure of the
removal of lower third molars is often a source of litigations1,2,3.
At the same time the impact of this on a person’s quality of life should not be
or partial odontectomy reduces the likelihood of nerve injury by insuring
retention of the vital roots when they are close or associated with the
inferior alveolar nerve as evaluated by plain radiography or CBCT4,5.
method aims to remove only the crown part of an impacted mandibular third molar
while leaving the root and pulp undisturbed, thereby avoiding direct or
indirect damage to the inferior alveolar nerve6,7,8. Literature
so far has hailed its merits and many practitioners regularly use the approach
of coronectomy in order to minimise Inferior alveolar nerve injuries. This
technique got in lime light in last decade although r…